Comments on: Equations of Motion http://www.physics-lab.net Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:48:11 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: jlgallup http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-278 jlgallup Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:52:13 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-278 When applied force goes over 140N, the position graph stops rising - that doesn't seem correct. When applied force goes over 140N, the position graph stops rising – that doesn’t seem correct.

]]> By: lachlan http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-257 lachlan Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:27:16 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-257 if you could put different levels of difficulty in the equations like having the simplest forms for; force = velocity = acceleration = cause not everyones a jenis lol if you could put different levels of difficulty in the equations like having the simplest forms for;
force =
velocity =
acceleration =

cause not everyones a jenis lol

]]> By: admin http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-231 admin Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:24:41 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-231 Thank you Toby, I have fixed the typo. Thank you Toby, I have fixed the typo.

]]> By: toby http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-230 toby Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:06:57 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-230 another typo is in equation 16: You have in the denominator: F_0 - kdv it should be: F_0 - kv so instead of dv it should read a simple v. another typo is in equation 16:

You have in the denominator: F_0 – kdv
it should be: F_0 – kv

so instead of dv it should read a simple v.

]]> By: John PlurnDoubbero http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-223 John PlurnDoubbero Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:17:52 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-223 First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more. First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.

]]> By: frank http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-141 frank Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:47:42 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-141 There is another typo between eqn (7) and (8) where you meant to write dx = (at + vo)dt and you wrote dx=(at+vo)t Very nice site and a great reference! I had a hard time finding sites that did a classic derivation like this There is another typo between eqn (7) and (8) where you meant to write
dx = (at + vo)dt and you wrote dx=(at+vo)t

Very nice site and a great reference! I had a hard time finding sites that did a classic derivation like this

]]> By: admin http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-100 admin Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:00:20 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-100 The typos have been fixed. Thank you for noticing that, Matt. The typos have been fixed. Thank you for noticing that, Matt.

]]> By: Matt Gilgenbach http://www.physics-lab.net/applets/equations-of-motion/comment-page-1#comment-99 Matt Gilgenbach Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:01:45 +0000 http://www.physics-lab.net/blog/?page_id=66#comment-99 Equation 22 has some typos. It should read x(t) = F0/k*t - m/k(v0-F0/k)e^(-k*t/m)+ m/k*(v0 - F0/k) + x0 The k/m coefficients on the second and third terms should be m/k. Otherwise, the page is very helpful! -Matt Equation 22 has some typos. It should read x(t) = F0/k*t – m/k(v0-F0/k)e^(-k*t/m)+ m/k*(v0 – F0/k) + x0

The k/m coefficients on the second and third terms should be m/k.

Otherwise, the page is very helpful!

-Matt

]]>